| |
|
|
Business Stationary Mart - Remington MS-5200 Titanium MicroScreens 700 Shaver, Cord/Cordless
|
List Price:
Our Price: $75.99
Your Save: $ ( % )
Availability: Usually ships in 3 to 5 weeks
Manufacturer: Remington
|
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Binding: Health and Beauty
Brand: Remington
EAN: 0074590830088
Feature: World's only shaver with three Titanium Microscreens
Label: Remington
Manufacturer: Remington
Model: MS5200DT
Publisher: Remington
Release Date: 2006-10-18
Studio: Remington
|
|
|
Features
|
World's only shaver with three Titanium Microscreens
Pop-up mini foil for precise results in even the tight spots; Beard-lifting comfort fins
3 position pop-up trimmer for precise trimming and hard to cut hairs
Rechargeable and corded with a 60 minute run time
Comes with a deluxe travel pouch, cleaning brush and compatible with worldwide voltage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: My new Remington
Comment: I bought the new Remington Microscreen 700 / MS-5200
to replace the Remington MS3 1700 which became slow and kept
dying on me. The new one is loud but it works OK, so far.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Remington
Comment: I am sure it is a great shaver, but I ordered it for my 94 year old father who is vision impaired. The battery did not hold its charge; the mini blade falls off easily during cleaning which for a visually impaired person is a problem, and the carrying case is too small for the shaver and the huge electric cord.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Remmington Titanium Shaver
Comment: Not as good as my old Titanium shaver. Battery does not last as long as advertized. The shave is not as close as the old Titanium shaver. Does not recharge as fast as advertized.
Customer Rating:
Summary: My MS 5200 shaver review.
Comment: I am writing my MS 5200 shaver review after 90 days of use and I have not regretted it.
I started out with a Schick electric shaver because my father had one and that was 61 years ago. After that I had an electric Sunbeam shaver, then a few electric Remingtons, then a Norelco, which I did not like. I went back to Remington shavers up to this time. I did shave with a wet blade for a few years in the service, no electric shaver shaves as close as that. All of my electric shavers were corded except for two battery Remingtons. I did not like battery shavers until I read one review about this MS 5200, being able to run on a dead battery using a cord immediately and it does, my other battery shavers would not. This shaver is not any noisier than any other electric shaver that I had, and I had many. They claim that it is washable, I doubt I will ever try that. They also claim up to three weeks of cordless running time, I get an average of 12 days. They also claim 'Quick Charge' feature, mind takes eight hours.
Pro: I like the LED panel displaying percentage of battery remaining, also the quality, the looks and the feel. It gives me a good fast smooth shave. I would buy it again and through Amazon.
Con: The shaver has a 5 minute reserve battery button for extra time, but mine does not work. It claims to have 3 Microsreens, but what you get is 2 1/2. Because of that half screen, I have to turn it upside down to shave square to my sideburns. BTW, the 1/2 screen does shave, probably meant for tight corners, that's probably all it's good for. Russ.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Cheap plastic
Comment: This product, which is a newer version of the 3 screen head that I had before is not made as good as the older one. I had the older one for over 4 years before I finally had to get a new one. This one has a cheap plastic part that holds the head on to the shaver. Why they did this is beyond me. It is not even close to the old one (basically couldn't break it), I broke this one in 4 days. I'm still waiting for the replacement. I also had problems with the charge (was gone within 10 hours), but I was hoping this would get better with more uses. The only reason I'm giving this a 2 star rating is because I do prefer the 3 screens, but I would love to be able to buy the older version instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
